sitemap updates RWCT store forums search log in / register русский
Exploring the Nature of Theory in a Teacher Research Community

 Who is who

 News and Announcements

 Current Issue

 Journal Archive

 Sample Articles

 For Authors

 For Reviewers

 For Advertisers

 Subscribing to Thinking Classroom or Peremena

Home >> Thinking Classroom Journal >> Journal Archive >> Volume 7 - 2006 >> Thinking Classroom #4 >> Exploring the Nature of Theory in a Teacher Research Community
Exploring the Nature of Theory in a Teacher Research Community

Make a comment

Exploring the Nature of Theory in a Teacher Research Community

Sharon Miller

If classroom teaching in elementary and secondary schools is to come of age as a professionif the role of teacher is not to continue to be infantilizedthen teachers need to take the adult responsibility of investigating their own practice systematically and critically, by methods that are appropriate to their practice.

Frederick Erickson (cited in Richardson, 2001, p. 301)

A few years ago, I worked with a teacher researcher who had an almost visceral negative reaction to the notion of theory. I had urged the participants in our Teacher Research and Inquiry Institute to read research and theory that was related to their study and that supported their assumptions about teaching and learning—research that would also support their research methods and their findings. Eve expressed disdain for and refused to read either traditional or non-traditional research that might support her inquiry.

I had asserted that once they had gone beyond their first year of teacher research, when they no longer struggled with the processes, they were very likely becoming theorists in their own right. I suggested that they, and others like them, had a great deal to offer to the conversation about teaching and learning, and that, along with formal theory, they should read the work of other teacher researchers, and should consider how they, too, could share their work on behalf of others.

Eve resisted the notion that other teacher researchers—published and unpublished—would serve this purpose, because the teacher researchers were not recognized theorists; they were teachers. She couldn't admit that she, by virtue of her teacher research study, was becoming a theorist and that she would have something to contribute to larger, more public conversations about teaching and learning.

As a result of her resistance, we began a series of conversations around the notion of theory and its relationship to classroom teachers. These conversations continued among this group—and others who would follow—for a period of two years.


... ... ...

Subscribe to read more!

Make a comment


© 2004-2005 Reading and Writing for Critical Thinking International Consortium. This website is supported by OSI-NY and NC partnership "Center of promoting RWCT."
Get Firefox! Get Adobe Reader