sitemap updates RWCT store forums search log in / register русский
Learning as Acquisition or Learning as Participation?

 Who is who

 News and Announcements

 Current Issue

 Journal Archive

 Sample Articles

 For Authors

 For Reviewers

 For Advertisers

 Subscribing to Thinking Classroom or Peremena

Home >> Thinking Classroom Journal >> Journal Archive >> Volume 8 - 2007 >> Thinking Classroom #1 >> Learning as Acquisition or Learning as Participation?
Learning as Acquisition or Learning as Participation?

Make a comment

Learning as acquisition
or learning as participation?


Ove Sandell


The metaphors we choose and use can shape as well as reflect our perceptions (Reddy, 1978). I was curious, therefore, to learn more about how students accounts of their learning would relate to metaphors commonly used in the professional literature to describe learning. My interest was sparked, in part, by an ongoing debate in the professional literature about the relationship of two seemingly distinct metaphoric representations of learning: learning as acquisition and learning as participation. Although these metaphors are prominent in the literature, I wondered if they would be evident in the way students framed their discussions of learning. I was also interested in whether these metaphors reflect contradictory and incompatible views of learning (and thus imply different actions and behaviors), or whether they can be productively integrated to offer a more richly informative perspective on the complexities of learning as actually experienced.

To explore these questions, I undertook a research assignment at Oestfold University College in Norway that enabled me to interview 24 pupils aged 16 to 20 about their school stories. In selecting participants, I sought those who indicated they had experienced, either presently or in their past, difficulties with reading and/or writing. My assumption was that such students would be more likely to have reflected on my questions than those who had never struggled with learning…

During our conversations, all informants received the following questions:

· How would you describe your school history?

· How would you describe good education or good learning situations?

· How do you learn?

· What characterizes good instruction?

· What characterizes a clever teacher?

This article presents the theoretical background and methodical considerations for the study and a summary of how 24 pupils, classified on the basis of their responses into two groups, answered the presented questions. The underlying goal of this study was to obtain information that would help me evaluate whether it is worthwhile to promote conceptual unification between cognitive and situated theories of learning.


... ... ...

Subscribe to read more!

Make a comment


© 2004-2005 Reading and Writing for Critical Thinking International Consortium. This website is supported by OSI-NY and NC partnership "Center of promoting RWCT."
Get Firefox! Get Adobe Reader